The leader of the Labour Party, Ed Miliband has today made a
very daring move for any Labour Leader as he vows to change the relationship
between the Trade Unions and his party.
In his speech today, Mr. Miliband outlined how he seeks to
reform a system in which the Unite Union could have exercised so much influence
over the selection process of parliamentary candidates. So what did he propose to do?
·
Trade Union members will no longer be
automatically affiliated with the Labour Party and candidates will have to obey
a new code of conduct.
·
Spending caps to be introduced for would-be
candidates and organisations, such as Trade Unions backing them which would
apply in domestic and European elections.
·
Constituency agreements with unions which would
ensure that there is a consensus that no one involved in the selection process will
be subject to any undue pressure.
·
Primaries, similar to those in the USA will be
favoured to choose parliamentary candidates, a move which could be used to
select Labour’s candidate for the office of Mayor for London.
In addition, Ed Miliband has also stated that he wishes to
see a limit on outside earnings obtained by Members of Parliament if he wins
the next general election in 2015.
![]() |
Ed Miliband vows to end current relationship with unions. |
Former Prime Minister Tony Blair has also today backed the announcement by Mr. Miliband as a ‘defining moment’. However, the problem with this endorsement from the former Prime Minister is that I do not believe that Blair regrets never introducing such measures which could potentially see a fall in party income. The General Secretary of the Unite Union, Len McCluskey has described the move as ‘very brave’ which indicates that even he was not expecting such a bold move from the Labour Leadership.
![]() |
Labour Party funding by Trade Unions. Source: Sky News |
Much to the surprise of many, Ed Miliband took the
opportunity to criticise those Members of Parliament who undertake work outside
of Parliament. We at the Adjournment disagree with this criticism; we believe
that Members of Parliament are entitled to a second job which will endeavour
them to bring expertise in debates.
If there is an important piece of legislation which comes
before the House of Commons regarding reform of the law around criminal
justice, the public would not only wish to see those members with legal
expertise to contribute to the debates, but we wish the public wish to see the
practising barristers and solicitors who are also Members of Parliament
contribute in intense debate so that we have confidence that those with the
expertise and those who have up to date knowledge are scrutinising proposed
legislation in our name with very analytical minds.
No comments:
Post a Comment